MALGAI 2026

Deadlines
Machine Learning/CORE Unranked

MALGAI 2026

Workshop on Multi-Agent Learning and Its Opportunities in the Era of Generative AI

Apr 26 2026Official workshop site Site reachable

The ICLR 2026 Workshop on Multi-Agent Learning and Generative AI (MALGAI 2026) explores the convergence of multi-agent learning and generative AI, focusing on LLM-based multi-agent systems, real-world distributed control, and human-AI interaction. It brings together researchers from machine learning, game theory, and human-computer interaction to advance theoretical and practical frameworks for next-generation multi-agent generative AI systems.

Official CFP Back to deadlines Verified September 9, 2026

Key deadlines

Verified September 9, 2026

Full paper

February 11, 2026

AoE

Workshop timeline

Submission and decisions

Full paperKey deadline

February 11, 2026 · AoE

Paper fit

Contribution paths

A strong submission should clearly identify its contribution and evaluate it appropriately.

Main Research Track

6-8 pages (excluding references and appendices) Full papers presenting novel methods, theoretical analyses, or comprehensive empirical results related to the workshop topics.

Blueprint Track

2-4 pages (excluding references and appendices) Visionary, exploratory, or critical perspectives, including conceptual frameworks, preliminary research, new perspectives, or tools/benchmarks.

Research areas in scope

01

Multi-Agent Learning Paradigms for LLMs

Cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning for improving coordination between modules within the multi-agent systemLLMs (LLM orchestration)Adversarial training for improving the generalizability of the single LLM trainingOpen multi-agent reinforcement learning/ad hoc teamwork for a multi-agent system LLMs to deal with some unknown and situational function/data providersFormalism of full/partial information required in modelling multi-agent system LLMs and the minimal information each agent needsStrengths/weaknesses of natural language as both the action space and the observation space in the multi-agent system LLMsCriteria for evaluating a "well structured" multi-agent system LLMs in completing a task (e.g., game-theoretic approaches and models)Coordination mechanisms for improving performance of multi-agent system LLMs, which can be either predefined or learned from dataStructures (e.g., chains, graphs, etc.) to represent a multi-agent system for LLMsApplication of coordination graphs (e.g., DAGs, factor graphs, etc.) on decomposing reward functions for training multi-agent system LLMs
02

Generative AI for Multi-Agent Learning

World models for improving the data quality for multi-agent learningReward models for improving multi-agent learning with sparse rewardsGenerative AI to generate a diverse set of agent modelsGenerative models (e.g., diffusion models) for improving multi-agent learningGraph-based generative AI for improving graph-structured multi-agent learning and emergent communication between agentsMulti-agent systems for the modular generative models
03

Multi-Agent Exploration for Generative AI

Multi-agent exploration for coordinating modules in the modular generative AI modelsThe role of entropy of agent policies (generators) in the modular generative AI learning
04

Environments for Testing and Developing Multi-Agent Learning

Environments of real-world decentralised or distributed control problemsComputationally efficient environments for generative AI-based multi-agent learningLight environments (without LLMs) for simulating the human-AI interaction processJAX environments for accelerating multi-agent simulation processes
05

Human-AI Interaction

Learning paradigms for improving the capability of AI agents to adapt to human instructions or proactively guide humansCapable and interpretable (explainable) human models trained by generative AIAppropriate medium of conveying human instructions to AI agents (e.g., natural language, formal methods and learning embeddings)Approaches for estimating human intentions enabling AI agents to make better decision

Policies worth checking twice

  • Submissions are required to use the provided workshop LaTeX template.
  • Double-blind review policy applies.
  • Submissions must be managed through OpenReview.
  • AI-generated papers are not permitted for normal or tiny paper submissions.
  • All AI contributions must remain under human oversight and validation.
  • The role of AI (if any) in the preparation of submissions must be transparently acknowledged.
  • We will follow the official ICLR 2026 Policies on Large Language Model Usage.
  • We will strictly adhere to the ICLR policy on Conflicts of Interest (COI).

Official sources

Compiled from the official call for papers. The organizers’ pages remain authoritative.

Last verified September 9, 2026